ROCKS OF THE BERKELEY HILLS: LEONA & NORTHBRAE RHYOLITES (Indian Rock, Cragmont Rock, Alvarado Parks)

 

Scattered throughout the Berkeley Hills are silica-rich rocks, which have been mapped as Tertiary (Dibblee, 1980, 1981; Radbruch and Case, 1967; Robinson, 1956), but which are now considered to be Upper Jurassic (Jones and Curtis, 1991).  The Geologic Map of the San Francisco-San Jose Quadrangle (California Division of Mines and Geology, 1991) identified these rocks as “rhyolite of uncertain age” and tentatively grouped them as part of the Coast Range Ophiolite.  Graymer (1996) characterized them as volcanic rocks (keratophyre and quartz keratophyre) overlying the Coast Range Ophiolite.

 

          Lawson (1914) named the rhyolites in the Berkeley Hills “Northbrae” and “Leona,” after the residential areas where they crop out.  Lawson apparently thought of the Northbrae as a flow-banded subset of the generally featureless Leona (Robinson 1956) and considered them to be Plio-Pleistocene.  In outcrop, the Leona (as seen at Tunnel Road and at Alvarado Park) is fractured, weathered, crumbling.  It has defied definitive analysis because it lacks distinctive textures and is very altered.  In contrast, the Northbrae, which crops out at Indian Rock Park and in adjacent neighborhoods in North Berkeley and Kensington, forms coherent prominences.   In contrast with the generally featureless and massive Leona, the Northbrae Rhyolite  is flow-banded and contains autobrecciated clasts, suggesting  its origin as a lava flow or dome.  (Autobrecciation occurs when a silica-rich lava rapidly congeals, becomes too viscous to flow and breaks into pieces.)  We interpret the brecciated rock at Cragmont Park (within a mile of Indian Rock) as part of this flow.  We have distinguished the flow-banded Northbrae Rhyolite chemically from the nonflow-banded Leona Rhyolite-type rocks at Alvarado Park and Tunnel Road by the former’s greater K2O content, as well as by distinctive trace-element values.

 

Rock sites:

 

Indian Rock Park

Cragmont Rock Park

Leona Rhyolite

Northbrae Rhyolite

 

CONCLUSIONS REGARDING PETROLOGY

 

          Although they differ significantly in outcrop and hand sample, all rocks described on this site exhibit relict volcanic textures in thin section. In hand sample and outcrop, Indian Rock (Northbrae Rhyolite) and Cragmont Rock differ significantly from the rocks at Tunnel Road and Alvarado Park (Leona Rhyolite) and from the quartz keratophyre in Del Puerto Canyon.   Indian Rock’s flow-bands, spherulites, and autobrecciation textures set it apart from the outcrops of Leona Rhyolite.   (A spherulite is a devritification texture of volcanic glass: the disordered glass crystallizes into spheres of radiating crystals which go in and out of extinction as the polarizer of a petrographic microscope is rotated.)    The brecciated rock at Cragmont Park is texturally distinct from all other rocks in the Berkeley Hills.

 

Devitrification textures in Indian Rock suggest that it originated as a glass flow.   The clasts of Cragmont Rock may represent silicified autobrecciation of that flow.  At Rock Lane in Berkeley, located equidistant between Indian Rock and Cragmont Rock, there is an exposure that exhibits textures that are characteristic of both Indian Rock and Cragmont Parks.   Relatively few Cragmont clasts retain their original flow-banding;  the majority of the clasts do not, possibly the result of intense silicification.   (An alternative explanation for the origin of the nonbanded clasts is that they may represent sicilified spherulites.)

 

          We did not observe any autobrecciation, flow-banding, or spherulitic textures in the Tunnel and Alvarado (Leona Rhyolite) rocks.  Nor did we observe in either Indian Rock or Cragmont Park the microlite-intense groundmass that we observed in Tunnel Rd, Alvarado Park, and Del Puerto Canyon keratophyre.  Moreover, silica replacement textures are common in Indian and Cragmont Rocks and virtually absent in Leona Rhyolite-type rocks and in the sample from the Del Puerto Canyon keratophyre.  The foregoing observations lead to an interpretation that the Northbrae (including Indian Rock and Cragmont Parks) and Leona Rhyolites in the Berkeley Hills have different petrogeneses.

 

GEOCHEMISTRY

 

We obtained chemical analyses of six samples: Indian Rock (Northbrae Rhyolite), rocks from Tunnel Road and Alvarado Park, Richmond (Leona Rhyolite), Del Puerto Canyon (Coast Range Ophiolite quartz keratophyre) and two samples from Cragmont Rock Park: clast and a mixture of clast and matrix.  We plotted the geochemical data to attempt to determine tectonic setting and petrogenetic relationship between our samples.

 

Na2O/K2O:  Leona Rhyolite-type rocks (Tunnel and Alvarado) are Na2O-rich and K2O-poor, whereas Northbrae Rhyolite has intermediate values for both oxides.  Cragmont Rock samples plot near zero values for both oxides, possibly reflecting the dilution of Na and K during the silicification of Cragmont Rock (98-99% silica).

 

REE Diagram (Nakamura 1974):  Leona Rhyolite-type rocks, Tunnel and Alvarado, plot like the keratophyre of Del Puerto Canyon: a flat pattern with no Europium (Eu) anomaly.  This pattern is characteristic of keratophyres in the Coast Range Ophiolite (Blake and Jones 1981).  Northbrae Rhyolite at Indian Rock Park exhibits a negative Eu anomaly and light rare earth element (REE) enrichment.  Cragmont clast and Cragmont clast/matrix, however, show extreme light REE depletion.  Cragmont Rock is the most silicified of our samples ( 98-99% SiO2).  Light REE depletion is possibly due to silica replacement (dilution); greater depletion of light REE may be due to trace minerals fixing the heavy REE.  Both Indian Rock and Cragmont Rock  exhibit negative Eu anomalies.  One possible interpretation of this diagram, taking into account the extreme silicification at Cragmont Rock, is a common origin for Indian and Cragmont Rocks, an origin that is different from that of Leona Rhyolite-type rocks and the keratphyre of Del Puerto Canyon.

 

Wood (1980):  The plot (Th-Hf/3-Ta) can be applied to intermediate and silicic lavas, as well as to basalts and is  good at identifying volcanic-arc basalts (Rollinson 1993).  The Alvarado and Tunnel rocks (Leona Rhyolite) plot as a volcanic arc, consistent with the widely held view that the Coast Range Ophiolite formed as a supra-subduction zone ophiolite (Shervais 1990).  The major question posed by this plot is why Del Puerto Canyon does not also plot as a volcanic arc.  (Caveat: We believe that our Del Puerto sample may not be entirely representative of Coast Range Ophiolite keratophyres.  Its low Zr values are not consistent with published values [Jones 1981].)

 

Pearce et al (1984):  These plots are based on a study of granites (defined as any plutonic rock with >5% modal quartz) from known tectonic settings: ocean ridge (ORG); volcanic arc (VAG); within plate (WPG); and collisional (SYN-COLG).   Where there is evidence of ocean setting, as in our samples, supra-subduction zone granites can be identified on the Nb-Y plot by their lower Nb content.  Leona Rhyolite-type rocks (Alvarado and Tunnel) and Del Puerto Canyon keratophyre have low Nb values, consistent with the interpretation that they are part of the Coast Range Ophiolite, which has a supra-subduction zone geochemical signature.  By contrast, the tectonic setting of the Northbrae Rhyolite at Indian Rock Park plots as an anomalous ridge.

 

SiO2-Zr:   In the rocks studied, Zr generally increases with SiO2, however, this plot illustrates the significant difference between Northbrae-type rocks (including Cragmont) and Leona Rhyolite-type rocks and the Del Puerto Canyon keratophyre.  Even when SiO2 of a Leona-type rock approaches that of a Northbrae Rhyolite (Indian Rock), Zr values are significantly lower for the Leona Rhyolite.

 

CONCLUSIONS REGARDING GEOCHEMICAL PLOTS

 

Our Na2O/K2O plot indicates that flow-banded rocks at Indian Rock Park and nearby locations contain significantly higher amounts of K2O and less Na2O than do the massive Leona Rhyolite rocks (Tunnel Rd and Alvarado Park) and the quartz keratophyre of Del Puerto Canyon.  Some workers who believe that both the Leona and Northbrae Rhyolites are both Coast Range Ophiolite keratophyres classify the silica-rich rocks south of the University of California, Berkeley campus as the Leona Rhyolite and the silica-rich rocks north of the campus as Northbrae. Our Na2O/K2O plot indicates that Leona-type rocks are located both north and south of the campus, “sandwiching” the chemically distinctive Northbrae rocks.  Therefore, we question the validity of this north/south of campus distinction.

 

Our REE diagram suggests that neither Indian Rock Northbrae Rhyolite nor Cragmont Rock share the same petrogenetic environment as do the Leona Rhyolite (Tunnel and Alavardo rocks) and the Coast Range Ophiolite keratophyre at Del Puerto Canyon.  Our Pearce (1984) plots further support this observation in that the Leona rocks and the keratophyre plot as volcanic arc/collision granites, whereas Indian Rock plots as an anomalous ridge.

 

 

CONCLUSION

 

 

The data and observations discussed above support the interpretation that:

·        Indian Rock Northbrae Rhyolite  and Cragmont Rock share the same petrogenetic environment;

·        Northbrae and Leona Rhyolites do not have the same petrogenesis;

·        The tectonic and accretionary history of the Berkeley Hills area is more complex than is indicated by current mapping of these rock units.

Possible explanations of our findings regarding the Northbrae include:

1. The Northbrae is a heretofore unrecognized distinctive member of the Coast Range Ophiolite;

2. The Northbrae has a provenance similar to rocks of  the Franciscan Complex, which are found to the west and east of it in the Berkeley Hills; and

3. The Northbrae has affinities not yet studied.

 

Comparative radiometric dating of the Northbrae Rhyolite is not feasible as we have found no datable zircons in any of our Indian Rock or Cragmont Park samples.   We intend to collect more Northbrae Rhyolite samples for geochemical analysis and comparision with other volcanics of the Berkeley Hills.  We recognize that the Berkeley Hills are a complex area whose geology is poorly exposed due to intense development and whose rocks have been juxtaposed and rearranged from their original geometries due to faulting and massive landsliding.

The research set forth on this site was presented at the meeting of the Cordilleran Section of the Geological Society of America in Berkeley, June 1999.  The geochemical analysis was funded, in part, by a grant from the Graduate School of California State University, Hayward.

We invite comment, criticism, and input.  Email Lin Murphy at: Lmarphy@haywire.csuhayward.edu.